Ground News
FreemiumNews comparison platform showing how stories are covered across the political spectrum with bias ratings, blind spot detection, and media literacy tools.
What does this tool do?
Ground News is a news aggregation and comparison platform that displays how major stories are covered across different media outlets positioned on a political spectrum (left, center, right). Rather than replacing news consumption, it acts as a transparency layer showing readers how the same story receives different coverage, emphasis, and framing depending on the outlet's editorial stance. The platform uses algorithmic bias ratings and highlights coverage gaps through its 'Blindspot' feature, which identifies stories being underreported by certain parts of the political spectrum. Users can browse curated news feeds, compare multiple angles on breaking stories, and access a browser extension that flags bias when reading articles from individual outlets.
AI analysis from Feb 23, 2026
Key Features
- Multi-perspective story comparison showing identical news covered by outlets across the political spectrum (left, center, right)
- Algorithmic bias rating system that labels outlets and assesses how stories are framed
- Blindspot detection feature highlighting stories underreported by certain political quadrants
- Browser extension for real-time bias ratings on articles while browsing the web
- Customizable news feed with interest-based topic subscriptions (politics, AI, business, health, etc.)
- Daily briefing summary consolidating multiple angles on key stories
- Local news filtering by geographic region alongside national and international coverage
Use Cases
- 1Identifying personal media bias by discovering stories you might miss due to your typical news consumption patterns
- 2Comparing how left-leaning, center, and right-leaning outlets frame the same event differently to understand narrative variance
- 3Educators teaching media literacy and critical thinking skills by showing students how political bias manifests in news coverage
- 4Researchers studying media coverage patterns and political polarization in journalism
- 5Executives and communicators understanding how different audiences perceive major announcements or corporate news
- 6Informed voters preparing for elections by seeing how candidates and issues are portrayed across the political spectrum
Pros & Cons
Advantages
- Provides genuine value by visualizing media bias in a structured way rather than claiming objectivity; the left-center-right framework is transparent and educational
- Browser extension functionality integrates bias ratings directly into articles as you read them across the web, creating a practical habit-forming tool
- Blindspot detection actively identifies coverage gaps, encouraging users to seek information they might otherwise miss rather than just confirming existing views
- Includes extensive local news coverage alongside national stories, addressing a genuine gap in most mainstream news aggregators
Limitations
- Bias ratings themselves are subjective and algorithmically determined; the platform doesn't fully disclose how outlets are classified on the political spectrum, which could introduce the very bias it claims to expose
- Relies on users having the motivation to read across the spectrum—the tool provides access but doesn't force exposure to opposing viewpoints
- Premium subscription required for full feature access, creating a paywall around media literacy tools that might be most needed by users without financial resources
- Limited to English-language news sources despite operating globally, excluding significant non-English coverage that shapes global discourse
Pricing Details
Pricing details not publicly available. The website shows a 'Subscribe' button and references a subscription model, but specific pricing tiers and costs are not displayed on the provided website content.
Who is this for?
Educated news consumers seeking to identify and counteract their own media bias, media literacy educators and students, journalists researching coverage patterns, politically engaged citizens wanting balanced perspective on elections and policy, and anyone concerned about echo chambers and polarization in their news diet.